不同施药方法与生境对饵剂防控红火蚁效能的影响

    Impact of Different Application Methods and Habitats on the Efficacy of Baits in Controlling Solenopsis invicta

    • 摘要:
      目的 毒饵撒施是当前防控红火蚁的主要手段。评价不同撒饵方式与生境条件对饵剂防控红火蚁效能的影响,旨在为饵剂的科学应用以及红火蚁高效防控提供重要数据支撑。
      方法 采用连续拍照法记录不同撒饵方式下红火蚁搬运饵剂耗时,依据红火蚁疫情监测规程(GB/T 23626—2009)中方法对不同生境施饵前后的工蚁与蚁巢数量进行调查与统计。
      结果 不同撒施方法显著影响红火蚁对饵剂的搬运效率,将饵剂直接撒施于蚁丘表面,工蚁平均耗时101.5 min将饵剂搬运完全,而将饵剂围绕蚁丘周围撒1圈或分段撒,工蚁平均耗时均低于70 min。不同撒施方法并未影响饵剂对红火蚁的防控效果。生境显著影响行间撒施饵剂防控红火蚁的效果,经过1次行间等量撒施饵剂,玉米地红火蚁工蚁平均减退率达90.28%,显著高于甘蔗地工蚁减退率(51.34%);经过1次补施后,两种生境工蚁减退率无显著差异。茚虫威饵剂在荒地、莲雾园、牧草地、澳洲坚果园与柠檬园5种生境首次施用后活蚁巢减退率均达98%以上,多杀霉素饵剂在鱼塘首次施用后活蚁巢减退率为55.82%。荒地、莲雾园、鱼塘3种生境在距离首次施药155 d时,每667 m2活蚁巢数量分别恢复至2.29、2.31、5个,而牧草地、澳洲坚果园、柠檬园每667 m2的活蚁巢数量仍少于1个。
      结论 撒饵方式并不会影响饵剂对红火蚁的防控效果,生境是影响饵剂防控效果的重要因素。在利用饵剂防控红火蚁时,应做好长期监测与适时补施,减少饵剂用量,获取最佳防控效果。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective Bait broadcasting is currently the primary method for controlling Solenopsis invicta. This study evaluated the impact of different application methods and habitats on the efficacy of baits in controlling S. invicta, aiming to provide crucial data support for the scientific application of baits and the efficient control of S. invicta.
      Method The time taken by S. invicta to transport bait formulations under different bait-broadcasting methods was recorded using the continuous photography method. The number of worker ants and ant nests in difference habitats before and after bait application was investigated and counted according to the methods specified in the Guidelines for quarantine surveillance of S. invicta Buren (GB/T 23626—2009).
      Result Different bait application methods significantly affect the transport efficiency of S. invicta towards baits. When baits are directly applied to the surface of ant mounds, worker ants take an average of 101.5 minutes to transport all the bait, whereas when bait is broadcast in a circle around the ant mound or in segments, the average time taken by worker ants is below 70 minutes. The study also showed that different broadcasting methods did not affect the control efficacy of baits against S. invicta. Habitats significantly influence the control efficacy of broadcasting baits between rows on S. invicta. After a single equal-amount broadcasting of baits between rows, the average reduction rate of worker ants in cornfields reached 90.28%, significantly higher than that observed in sugarcane fields (51.34%). Following a supplementary application, no significant difference in worker ant reduction rates was detected between the two habitats. Upon the initial application of indoxacarb bait across five different habitats—wasteland, wax apple orchard, grassland, macadamia-nut orchard, and lemon orchard—the reduction rate of active ant nests consistently surpassed 98% in every scenario. In contrast, following the first application of spinosad bait in fishponds, the reduction rate of active ant nests reached 55.82%. For indoxacarb-based baits, the reduction rates of active ant nests after the first application exceeded 98% across all five tested habitats. In three specific habitats—wasteland, wax apple orchard, and fishpond—the density of active ant nests recovered to 2.29, 2.31, and 5 per 667 m2, respectively, by the 155th day following the initial bait application. In contrast, the density of active nests in grassland, macadamia-nut orchard, and lemon orchard remained consistently below 1 per 667 m2 throughout the same monitoring period.
      Conclusion The bait-broadcasting method does not affect the control efficacy of baits against red imported fire ants. Habitat is significant factor influencing the control efficacy. When using baits to control S. invicta, long-term monitoring and timely supplementary applications should be carried out to reduce bait consumption and achieve optimal control results.