新增V元件插入位置对辣椒GWSF启动子激素应答活性的影响

    Effect of V-box Insertion Position on Hormone Response Activity of GWSF Promoter in Capsicum annuum

    • 摘要:
      目的 理想的人工启动子可精确调控目的基因的时空表达,用于作物遗传改良。GWSF(4个病原诱导活性元件二聚体Gst1-box、W-box、S-box、F-box依次连接于CaMV minimal 35S启动子组成的人工启动子)是较为理想的植物病原诱导型启动子,在其序列的不同位置引入V-box元件并探讨新元件的位置效应,为人工启动子的设计与应用提供参考。
      方法 分别将V-box元件的二聚体引入GWSF启动子上游、中游和下游,根据引入位置将3个改良启动子依次命名为VGWSF、GWVSF和GWSFV。用其分别替换pBI121质粒中控制gus基因表达的CaMV35S启动子,得到重组质粒后导入农杆菌GV3101。用农杆菌瞬时表达法转化辣椒叶片,侵染12 h后用ABA、SA和Eth诱导处理12 h,再用GUS染色法和实时荧光定量PCR(qPCR)检测启动子本底活性和激素诱导活性。
      结果 与原启动子GWSF相比,新元件引入后得到的3个改良启动子(VGWSF、GWVSF、GWSFV)本底转录水平均明显升高。以CaMV35S转录水平为1,Pfaffl相对定量法测定结果显示,GWSF本底转录水平为0.190,而VGWSF、GWVSF和GWSFV分别为3.348、2.503和0.953,较原启动子分别提高17.613倍、13.165倍和5.011倍。在ABA的诱导下,3个改良启动子转录水平均高于自身本底水平:VGWSF诱导后达12.309(为本底的3.676倍),GWVSF为4.7831. 911倍),GWSFV为5.405(5.674倍);SA处理后,VGWSF和GWVSF转录水平分别降至0.502和0.244,较各自本底下降85% 和90%,而GWSFV升高至2.464;Eth处理后,3个改良启动子转录活性均受抑制,转录水平均低于0.520。
      结论 引入V-box后改良启动子本底转录水平升高。GWSFV本底转录水平相对较低,受ABA或SA诱导后,转录活性升高明显。新增V-box的位置显著影响原启动子的转录特性。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The ideal artificial promoter can precisely regulate the spatiotemporal expression of genes for crop genetic improvement. V-box element was introduced at different positions within GWSF, an ideal plant pathogeninducible promoter, to investigate the positional effects of new elements and provide a reference for the design and application of synthetic promoters.
      Method The dimer of the V-box element was introduced into the upstream, midstream, and downstream position of the GWSF promoter, and the three modified promoters were subsequently named VGWSF, GWVSF, and GWSFV according to their respective insertion positions. These promoters were used to replace the CaMV35S (cauliflower mosaic virus 35S) promoter in the plasmid pBI121 to control the expression of β-glucuronidase (gus) gene. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. The leaf discs of Capsicum annuum were transient transformed using the Agrobacterium-mediated method. After 12 h, the transformed leaf discs were treated with abscisic acid, salicylic acid, or ethylene for another 12 h. The inducible transcriptional levels of modified promoters were detected by GUS staining and realtime quantitative PCR (qPCR).
      Result Compared with the original promoter GWSF, the basal transcription levels of the three improved promoters (VGWSF, GWVSF, GWSFV) significantly increased. Normalized the transcription level of CaMV35S as 1, the basal transcription level of GWSF was 0.190, while those of VGWSF, GWVSF, and GWSFV were 3.348, 2.503, and 0.953, respectively, which were 17.613-fold, 13.165-fold, and 5.011-fold higher than the original promoter. Under ABA induction, the transcription levels of the three improved promoters were all higher than their basal levels: VGWSF reached 12.309 after induction (3.676-fold of the basal level), GWVSF was 4.783 (1.911-fold), and GWSFV was 5.405 (5.674-fold). After SA treatment, the transcription levels of VGWSF and GWVSF decreased to 0.502 and 0.244, respectively, an 85% and 90% decrease from their basal levels, while GWSFV increased to 2.464. After ethephon treatment, the transcriptional activity of the three improved promoters was inhibited, with transcription levels all below 0.520.
      Conclusion The basal transcription level of the modified promoters increased with the introduction of V-box. The basal transcription level of GWSFV was relatively low, and its transcriptional activity increased significantly when being induced by ABA or SA. The position of the V-box had a significant impact on the transcriptional characteristics of the original promoter.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回